Post-hoc sensitivity audit (October 24, 2026)
- Archived result
- Executed reanalysis
What it is not. Post-hoc and exploratory. Diagnostic ranges are not confidence intervals; nothing here increases n or establishes biological validation.
Dates, kept apart
- Archived result recorded
- Versioned in the research repository; see the execution record
- Executions
- 2026-10-24 20:40:07 UTC · research repository
- Repository commit
a434af9- This page rendered
- · a view date, not an execution or publication date
Values read from the files
Read from the versioned result files of the research repository at commit a434af9, verified by SHA-256.
| Quantity | Value | Unit | Source file |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTC measured rows / distinct contexts | 12 / 8 | rows / contexts | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| Exact six-base matches | 0 | rows | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| Median paired increment, full set | +0.0165 | percentage points | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| Leave-one-row-out range | +0.0140 to +0.0190 | percentage points (finite range, not an interval) | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| Leave-one-context-group-out range | +0.0135 to +0.0285 | percentage points (finite range, not an interval) | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| Difference of marginal medians | +0.0240 | percentage points (a different quantity) | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| GSE65145 thresholds selecting the same features | 95%, 97.5%, 99%, 99.5% | reciprocal overlap | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| GSE65145 thresholds with no eligible feature | 100% | reciprocal overlap (insufficient, not zero expression) | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| GSE65145 Rap / Pro, arithmetic versus geometric | 0.585706 versus 0.584998 | ratio | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
| GSE65145 leave-one-sample-out range | 0.542241 to 0.629171 | ratio (finite range) | sensitivity_results.json (research repository) |
Execution records
Each row is a run with a record. “Match” means the output bytes hash to the archived value: deterministic computation reproduced, nothing more.
| Execution / record time | What ran | Environment | Inputs | Artifacts versus archive | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research repository | Sensitivity audit validation by the research repository (October 24, 2026)11 tests passed, 0 failed; a second run into a separate directory was byte-identical (9 files). | CPython 3.12.14 Existing environment, not isolated | 14 / 14 verified by SHA-256Previously downloaded public cache inputs, each verified against unchanged original manifest; not a fresh network download. |
|
Record (JSON) At the commit |
Traceability
- Primary source
- See the dataset and the research repository documents below.
- Dataset
- The same manifest-verified inputs of the PTC and GSE65145 reanalyses.
- Biological model
- Same models as the two reanalyses it audits.
- Samples
- PTC: 12 measured rows / 8 contexts (exhaustive deletions). GSE65145: 2 samples per condition, 3 redundant features.
- Parameters
- Protocol frozen before the calculations, after the original results were known; amendment 01 recorded before execution
- Exhaustive finite-set deletions; no random seed, bootstrap, p-value or interval
- Script
track2/reproduction/robustness/run_sensitivity.py· SHA-256c12e186cb037a55324020e25dc222adea634d34d7c0502e1741502e585f1d104· download- Command
python track2/reproduction/robustness/run_sensitivity.py; python track2/reproduction/robustness/test_sensitivity.py
Downloads
The manifest lists sources, model, samples, parameters, script, commit, inputs, execution records and every file below with its SHA-256. Its generatedAt is when it was written, not an execution date.